Author: Mark Ludwikowski <markl02us@yahoo.com> · INTERNAL / PREVIEW — ADRIZ self-assessment for INGV review. Use your browser’s Print → Save as PDF for a PDF copy.

Executive Summary — ADRIZ Etna Wildfire / Volcanic Visual Monitoring System

For: INGV decision-makers · Author: Mark Ludwikowski · Frozen baseline: commit 4d1b0cc (master) · Verified: 2026-06-29 UTC


What the system is

ADRIZ is a public-data-driven visual monitoring system for Mount Etna and the surrounding Sicilian flanks. It addresses the defining difficulty of this environment: vegetated, populated flanks that genuinely burn sit directly beneath an active volcano whose degassing, ash, lava glow, and strombolian activity are constant visual confounders. The system is built entirely from public feeds and low-cost commodity compute — no proprietary satellites, no edge or specialist hardware assumed.

It is a four-layer pipeline:

  1. Camera wall — 5 configured public camera sources (the INGV EtnaTVChn mosaic, three Windy webcams, and the EtnaWalk stream), processed on a 75-second model-resident cycle, with honest per-source online/offline health reporting.
  2. Frozen detector — a YOLO11s object detector (weights sha256 c0a3d0ea…) generates per-frame candidate boxes.
  3. Crop-level Qwen3-VL semantic veto (qwen3-vl-32b, temperature 0.0) — invoked only on detector-routed hot/bright crops, asking WILDFIRE / VOLCANIC / NEITHER. A durable night-safety override makes it recall-safe at night.
  4. Multi-feed corroboration + 64-feed data board — independent public satellite/weather/geospatial feeds (NASA FIRMS, Sentinel-3 SLSTR, MTG-FCI, MSG-SEVIRI, Sentinel-5P TROPOMI SO₂, CAMS) place each candidate in context, with operational staleness classification and a bilingual (Italian/English) dashboard.

Headline numbers (held-out evaluation — research-grade, small-sample)

On a held-out, leakage-controlled evaluation (these are offline benchmark numbers, not a live alert-dispatch measurement):

What is LIVE vs STAGED vs RESEARCH

LIVE_OPERATIONAL (deployed, running, current health evidence): - The camera wall (75 s cadence) — 3 of 5 sources online at verification (the INGV mosaic and EtnaWalk were OFFLINE; reported honestly, never faked). - The detector + crop-level VLM veto, running in the live service. - The 64-feed board: 46 live / 7 stale / 10 catalogued / 1 key-pending / 0 error, with a guard ensuring a degraded feed cannot masquerade as "live-with-zero" (live read: 23,379 roads / 341 rail; FWI 13.06 moderate). - WF36 corroboration logic for the 5 rule-backed classes (wildfire smoke, wildfire flame, lava/incandescence, ash plume, steam/degassing). - Bilingual dashboard (240/240 IT/EN key parity); hourly feed refresh; dedup/staleness guards.

STAGED_NOT_LIVE (built but not active in production): - Automated alert email dispatch (gated off) and the human-in-loop review workflow — the dashboard is explicitly an internal/preview self-assessment tool ("Not a public product"). - 8 corroboration classes (cloud, glare, frozen-frame, fog/haze, industrial smoke, dust, camera artifact, unknown) — staged targets, not claimed as detected or corroborated.

RESEARCH_ONLY (evaluated offline; not an operational claim): - All the headline performance metrics above (held-out, small-n). - The quantum evaluation — on the Etna volcanic-vs-wildfire task, simulated quantum classifiers were beaten by matched classical models with confidence intervals that exclude zero (a clean publishable negative). No quantum hardware was used; the one genuine novelty (volcanic source-inversion as a QUBO) is kept as a research line.

Honest limitations (reviewer-facing)

Next steps

  1. 0–2 weeks: instrument latency tails and frame-capture success rate; harden the camera-frame endpoint; add a frozen-frame guard.
  2. 1 month: enlarge the held-out sets to tighten the confidence intervals; run an adversarial hard-negative robustness battery.
  3. 3 months: domain adaptation across the distinct camera domains (the core next pillar); benchmark detector/segmentation challengers (RT-DETR, Grounding DINO, SAM 2) against the frozen baseline.
  4. 6 months: IR/thermal fusion (directly attacks the night lava-vs-fire ambiguity), a fine-tuned Etna wildfire/volcano VLM, and MTG-FCI event tracking (rate-of-spread, fire-arrival maps) — moving FCI from coverage-only context to genuine event tracking.

Bottom line

ADRIZ is a reproducible, evidence-backed, operationally-honest architecture for multi-source wildfire/volcanic monitoring at Etna. It demonstrably reduces volcanic false alarms while preserving daytime wildfire recall and remaining recall-safe at night, with every component classified by its true operational status and every limitation stated. It is not claimed to solve early wildfire detection generally; it is a defensible foundation and a clear roadmap toward an operational INGV decision-support tool.